Klopp reminded me of the Americans at the Ryder Cup a few years ago, running across the green because one of them holed a long putt but the Europeans still had a putt to extend the match.
As someone just said on another site lets take all the emotion out of the game and just sit on our hands and politely say well done at the end of the game. ;wink
A 'someone' who lacks the ability to think logically, or else wants to justify any behaviour as long as it springs from 'emotion'. Are they permanently stuck at being 5 years old?
A ridiculous comment, imo.
In no way is it an either/or choice. That comment implies that saying no to racism=banning all emotion. Which is obviously not true.
You can have lots of emotion, without racist abuse, violence, and dangerous behaviour.
In my opinion, the argument that by prohibiting and sanctioning certain unacceptable behaviours you are taking all emotion out of the game is both ridiculous and insidious. And usually used to justify what most right thinking people would deplore.
Maybe I am missing the point but we are not talking about behaviour that was racially abusive, violent or offensive against the person.
A case can be made that what he did was unnecessary and disrespectful but I consider it a false equivalency to compare his actions to someone displaying behaviour that most right thinking people would consider criminal.
Me too Slav, and if so, yeh its good to show emotions and enjoy yourself, however Klopp just over did it by running onto the pitch and going wild, that would have freaked all West ham fans out if it was against us, so u can imagine how the Toffee fans felt about it, I personally hope he gets banned from touchline for a few matches.
chicago - since fortune posted after me (where I referenced the arrests for public order offences, projectiles incl. banana skin thrown at Aubemayan, lighting smoke canisters) and didn't say he was commenting on something that had been said prior, it looked to me like he was describing that as the 'emotional side of the game.'
If, although he didn't say so, he was referencing Klopp, then obviously it wasn't as bad.
My point remains: you don't 'take all emotion out of the game' by expecting professional adults, at their place of work, to behave appropriately. To suggest otherwise is a false dichotomy.
After last nights matches, the league now seems to have split into three clear sections. We have the pot hunters at the top, with Man City on 41pts, down to Arsenal on 31pts. Then we have an eight point gap to the middlemen with Everton on 23 pts down to West Ham on 18points. Then the bottom gap, dreading the drop with Newcastle with 13pts down to bottom placed Fulham on 9 pts. Obviously I would like us to climb up a few places, but can't see us getting into to the pot hunters club.
Comments
Disgraceful behaviour imo.
Including a Spurs supporter arrested after he threw a banana skin at Aubemayang.
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2018/dec/02/arsenal-tottenham-banana-skin-thrower-pierre-emerick-aubameyang
A ridiculous comment, imo.
In no way is it an either/or choice. That comment implies that saying no to racism=banning all emotion. Which is obviously not true.
You can have lots of emotion, without racist abuse, violence, and dangerous behaviour.
In my opinion, the argument that by prohibiting and sanctioning certain unacceptable behaviours you are taking all emotion out of the game is both ridiculous and insidious. And usually used to justify what most right thinking people would deplore.
Classic example of a straw man.
I'm not taken in by it for a second.
'Yeah, I know I shouldn't have punched her in the face, but we was having a row'
Would you defend that by saying ' or we could just take all emotion out of a marriage'?
A case can be made that what he did was unnecessary and disrespectful but I consider it a false equivalency to compare his actions to someone displaying behaviour that most right thinking people would consider criminal.
Just my tuppence worth
;puzzled
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/46420874
If, although he didn't say so, he was referencing Klopp, then obviously it wasn't as bad.
My point remains: you don't 'take all emotion out of the game' by expecting professional adults, at their place of work, to behave appropriately. To suggest otherwise is a false dichotomy.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/46420874
What!!!!!! Benny once scored ten goals or more, never ;whistle
Given it was Benny, I suppose the 10 shots on target could have been over a couple of seasons...
One part of that is great news, i'll let you guess which half it is. ;wink
clear sections.
We have the pot hunters at the top, with Man City on 41pts, down to Arsenal
on 31pts.
Then we have an eight point gap to the middlemen with Everton on 23 pts
down to West Ham on 18points.
Then the bottom gap, dreading the drop with Newcastle with 13pts down
to bottom placed Fulham on 9 pts.
Obviously I would like us to climb up a few places, but can't see us getting
into to the pot hunters club.