Board/Fan Relationship

1235758

Comments

  • I imagine the issue isn't particularly 'dealing with flags' but more 'threatening the stewards', 'failing to comply with a steward's request' or violent conduct/


    As for the Leicester game, the club has a clear public policy on flags/banners as well as on other aspects of behaviour, penalties and sanctions Vhttp://www.whufc.com/new-stadium/visiting-london-stadium


    Specifically, banners regs are:
    London Stadium allows supporters to display flags and banners on West Ham United match days provided that:

    The banner is manufactured to British Standards and has been certified as fire retardant

    The banner is no larger than two metres by two metres. However, we will consider requests to bring larger banners into the home section when they are made in advance by emailing [email protected]

    The banner is displayed in a suitable location and does not obstruct commercial, venue or event owner branding, LED panels or seats in use. Banners may be displayed in areas pre-agreed with West Ham United, and at the discretion of the club. Please contact [email protected] for more information.

    The content of the banner is not derogatory or offensive to any individual or group. Defamatory, political or offensive slogans will not be Banners in support of the team and players are welcomed.

    Kindly note that flag poles are not permitted

  • Ironherb I think you are being personal. I do criticise the team when I think it’s justified and give credit when I think it’s due. As for being conspicuous by my absence when we win then such absences have been few and far between this past season and a bit.
    I’ve been a hammer for about 65 years and was a season ticket holder for a number of them and for a good number of years travelled to all away games too including several European trips.
    I’ve seen about 5 relegations and don’t want to see that go to 6.
    If you can tell me of all the managers available who would be a better short term choice than Moyes I’d be interested in hearing it.

  • The latest from outside Sully residence

    If they want to protest, do it outside the stadium or other club venue. Not outside someone's home. Classless.
  • I'm pro Moyes, for the short term anyway.
  • Exactly the point I was making.
  • edited November 2017
    MrsGrey said:


    The latest from outside Sully residence

    If they want to protest, do it outside the stadium or other club venue. Not outside someone's home. Classless.
    As I understand it it is the owner of this flag who has had his 2 ST's revoked and not the guys at vicarage Road.

    http://www.kumb.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=170162&st=0&sk=t&sd=a
  • Ironherb I think you are being personal. I do criticise the team when I think it’s justified and give credit when I think it’s due. As for being conspicuous by my absence when we win then such absences have been few and far between this past season and a bit.
    I’ve been a hammer for about 65 years and was a season ticket holder for a number of them and for a good number of years travelled to all away games too including several European trips.
    I’ve seen about 5 relegations and don’t want to see that go to 6.
    If you can tell me of all the managers available who would be a better short term choice than Moyes I’d be interested in hearing it.

    Depends what you are going to cough up
    #iamtoldeveronrehasaprice
  • edited November 2017
    IH, gotcha ;ok

    I'm going to wait and see for the facts to emerge.

    It's not that long ago everyone got their knickers in a twist about some STs being revoked when it later transpired that wasn't the case.
  • MrsGrey said:


    The latest from outside Sully residence

    If they want to protest, do it outside the stadium or other club venue. Not outside someone's home. Classless.
    Don’t disagree, they (or someone) did it regarding SA as well.

    Not most peoples style i wouldn’t think but some will go this far.
  • No excuse to be at someone's house, that is harassment in my view. I am happy inside the stadium as well as outside but essentially you are protesting about their management of the club, so protesting against them as owners or directors so the club is the place to protest, once it goes to someone's house it becomes personal and no fan has the right to do that.

    I think every club has a certain element within them unfortunately and too many stories over the years of players cars vandalised etc . I think that element of our club actually vandalised Payet's car if I recall correctly, which is much the same thing, his attitude was appalling and if you want to chant, wave a flag in or out to express your view that seems fair enough, but this other stuff is just unacceptable.
  • MrsGrey said:

    IH, gotcha ;ok

    I'm going to wait and see for the facts to emerge.

    It's not that long ago everyone got their knickers in a twist about some STs being revoked when it later transpired that wasn't the case.

    So, this is what I think has happened....

    The owner of the flag hung at Sully mansion wasn’t even there when it was done, the club know who he is though.

    They were told that he and another had lost their ST and were banned for 3 years from home away tickets, this is what their side of the story.

    Dave Walker from SD&CC went on a massive rant from Sunday about how Toxic the fan base is right now and generally defending the owners as well as ridiculing the ban story. He doubted big time they actually lost anything and went with the club line (Dave Sullivan Jnr) that it was a misunderstanding and everything including the away points was put back. He laid into various people suggesting the club were lying about that

    Today he’s issued his own apology to the fan and flag owner he took to task, turns out these fans did have their ST revoked 3 year ban and loss of all away ticket points.

    He took the side of Dave Sully Jnr and his club contacts, he may not be so quick to do that again

  • I still don't see what justification he can have for demonstrating outside someones house. IMHO its just not on.

    If I owned West Ham and they did that to me, you could bet your last dollar I'd ban them from the ground.

    But I'm a vindictive menopausal hot mess so I might just have dealt with him myself, face to face...

    image
  • Izzy, but on his twitter he also says the tickets+ points were reinstated.

  • If its true tickets were lost (rather than just an attempt at a cover up), and not reported, then of course the tickets should be cancelled. Because somone else is using them fraudulently (or maybe not so fraudulently, depending on how true the 'lost' story is.)

    There's clearly more to this than meets the eye.

    How many people are telling the whole truth and nothing but the truth?
  • The board have brought this level of animosity on themselves. As someone else said on here the promises/hogwash spouted over the past few years including World class players, World class venue, 20 goal a season strikers, next level this, next level that, champions league, with the top six looking over their shoulders etc etc etc etc have raised levels of expectation amongst supporters above and beyond what the current board are actually capable of delivering. People that were dead against the move have been proved right (in their minds), waiverers are now probably anti-move and even armchair supporters like myself who supported the move now feel somewhat cheated. I personally now wish we hadn`t moved. I do feel that the current board, and particularly Brady, are looking to re-brand West Ham, and she in particular would be more than happy if ALL previous season ticket holders were banned and the new breed of happy clappy, popcorn munching, prawn sandwich prosecco drinkers were wheeled in instead. West Ham has a strong, traditional, working class following, it`s history is steeped in working class struggle and its support is synonymous with that East End blitz spirit. Cheeky cockneys. I fear that since the move all this will be lost and the board, and particularly Brady, won`t bat an eyelid. There seems a sense of sleazy commercialism in every decision the board makes.

    "FEELING DOWN AS A WEST HAM SUPPORTER"

    Click here to purchase our proven tonic and pick me up

    I think 100% now that the move was based entirely on personal greed. It was never about the good of West Ham as a football club and definitely, definitely nothing to do with the supporters. It was a commercial decision pure and simple, and not one to benefit the club and fans, but one to personally enrich the board. I think they have been rumbled, and I can absolutely understand the level of animosity now present amongst supporters who go week in, week out, home and away, and probably spend a large proportion of their wages doing it. What has brought this to a tipping point is the absolute rubbish football being served up week in week out, but it`s not the players or the manager baring the brunt (which would seem the obvious outlet) but the board. West Ham have had rubbish teams, played rubbish football and been relegated regularly since I have supported them, it`s what makes the highs so wonderful. What we had though was an identity and The Boleyn. The Boleyn has gone (for sound reasons so I thought) our identity is being chipped away and the dreams we were sold are fading and dying (oh dear). That`s the difference, in the past they were our dreams, personal to each and every one of us, we all had our own different levels of expectation. Avoid relegation, a decent cup run, beat the Spuds this year, win at Anfield. When I really think about it I never wanted next level, never really thought about it. But I was sold it, or rather mis-sold it, a bit like PPI. It`s something I never really wanted or asked for but I was suckered. What do we do when we feel cheated, robbed? We lash out. The football isn`t the problem, we`ve been there before, the problem is the board sold us a lie. The rubbish football is irrelevant, but what it has done is raised the questions: "Why the hell have we moved to a 60,000 seat athletics stadium?" and "Why are we now called West Ham London".
    From my perspective it all seems so pointless now, I was sold something (the next level) that I never really wanted and certainly never asked for. And that is all down to the board. The blighters.
  • edited November 2017
    Madcap
    "But I was sold it, or rather mis-sold it, ---------- "

    You mean, a bit like £350million per week for the NHS ;biggrin
  • Yep, changed my mind on Brexit too.
  • edited November 2017
    Madcap, refresh my memory, does that mean that you're for or against now.
  • Sorry, I should have clarified that. I thought in the past that Brexit was possibly the best course of action for the future of our country, indeed, any country should have the right to unequivocal self determination. I am now convinced of it. ;biggrin
  • NEoldiron said:

    Madcap
    "But I was sold it, or rather mis-sold it, ---------- "

    Call "The Claims guys" now to see if you qualify for mis-sold stadium compensation
    ;biggrin
  • Well we could also put claims in for mis-sold footballers why were at it
  • edited November 2017
    MadCap

    I find myself slightly bemused (beyond my resting state of generally befuddled, that is.)

    I didn't think the board had promised anything, beyond trying to improve the club.

    From where they got us, I think they have.

    The football has been poor for a while now, but when you look at the (at least theoretical) quality of the squad now compared to when they took over, it's hard to argue that the standard of players (at least theoretically) hasn't improved.

    The board get derided for being unambitious, until they express some ambition, and then they are derided as fools or liars.

    What I would like to see them deliver is regular mid-table mediocrity, (which, from where they got us would be the next level, imo) before I start worrying about further levels.

    I don't see how people can argue that they haven't overseen the signing of players good enough to achieve that. Most fans, it seems to me, seem to think that as a team we are vastly underachieving with the players we have available.

    They did the only thing they could have done in the circumstances, which was to get rid of Slav.

    As to whether Moyes is the man to get the squad playing better, time will tell.

    So, I fail to share your attitude towards the board, and consider our current miserable state more of the same in the generally disappointing lot of a Hammers fan's supporting life.
  • Would like that post 10 times if I could Madcap. Very well said.
  • The problem I have with the board is that they have sold us a dream that I don`t think they are capable of delivering. In order to pursue this dream we were told that we would need to move ground and it would be a good idea to re-brand as "West Ham London". This next level stuff is a smokescreen, we as supporters don`t necessarily want it (I have been quite happy with the level we bumble along at for the past 50 years generally) and THEY aren`t capable of delivering it. All I think (and I must admit I may be way off here) they are interested in doing is increasing the net worth of West Ham London so that they can sell at a very handsome profit in a few years time. As far as I can see the supporters are at the bottom of a very long list of priorities, and I think the supporters have woken up to this.
  • edited November 2017
    And thankyou Horsham ;ok

    And sorry Grey, meant to say that from a traditional die hard supporters perspective, and from a traditional working class football club perspective (not a commercial venture perspective) we are in a worse position than when they took over, so no, I don`t think they have improved us, on the narrow definition, of simply being a football club.
  • Well, sorry Madcap, but

    a) I'm a traditional die hard supporter (if 47/56 years counts for that)

    b) I'm working class

    and you don't speak for my perspective.

    By all means, be as disappointed in them as you want, but don't assume that others have to share your viewpoint, or that you can speak for a class/group.

    Since you haven't defined what you mean by 'simply being a football club',
    I have no real idea what you think that means, outside the standard definition.
  • MadCap, that's a very interesting and if I may say so heartfelt emotional, post from someone who obviously cares a great deal about the club they have supported through thick and thin.

    For me, I would be happy to be able to really look forward to every match day and not have that feeling of despair which seems to be obligatory every post match.
    We have always been an unpredictable club but lately have got to the stage where I don't expect us to get anything from the games. Even when 2-0 up against Palace I just knew we would throw it away.

    During the Payet season I just so enjoyed looking at the teams around the top of the league to see if we could finish higher than them. Now we are back to my desparately hoping the sides around us at the bottom lose.

    Surely it's not too much to ask that I am not dreading every match from almost the start of the season almost every year.

    ;yercoat
  • Sorry, just one more thing, I don`t hate the owners, I could never muster the required level of vitriol to hurl abuse in their general direction, I just think that they have been less than honest with us as supporters and I don`t trust their motives. I can understand though why some die-hard fans who opposed the move are now "up in arms" because as I say, and this comes from someone who supported the move, I now think it was a huge mistake. It definitely feels a different club to the one I grew up with, but perhaps that`s just the modern World and "progress" that I have a downer on.
  • Grey, I don`t think I speak from anyones perspective but my own. All I`m trying to say is that I understand the level of animosity directed at them and they have no-one to blame but themselves.
  • What I meant was, I preferred the football club "West Ham United" to "West Ham London". So from MY point of view the club has gone backwards. And that is what I meant from the narrow definition of a football club.
Sign In or Register to comment.